IOSG Founding Partner: The Pump.fun public sale seems more like the team seeking liquidity exit, with the project and market fundamentals unable to support the inflated valuation.
BlockBeats News, July 10th, IOSG Founding Partner Jocy posted on social media, stating that he believes this Pump.fun public sale is more like using participants as exit liquidity, constituting a highly speculative gamble.
Jocy stated that since its launch in early 2024, Pump.fun has experienced explosive growth, with a cumulative protocol revenue of about $7 billion, becoming one of the most profitable projects in the cryptocurrency field. However, Pump.fun's daily revenue has dropped by 92% from its peak, currently standing at only about $500,000. The project's market cap has plummeted from tens of millions of dollars in the past to a rock-bottom $50,000 to $100,000. Its market share has also been surpassed by a competitor, LetsBonk (with a 51% share), causing Pump.fun to fall to 39.9%.
From a tokenomics and risk exposure perspective, this ICO round targeted retail investors (15%) and institutions (18%), selling a total of 33% of the tokens, corresponding to a funding amount of $1.32 billion. Considering past fee revenues, the http://Pump.fun team will hold nearly $2 billion in cash. This poses an extremely unfriendly risk exposure to public investors:
· Lack of transparent governance structure: Decision-making process is a mystery
· Team/Investor release terms are opaque
· Overvalued financing has overdrawn future growth potential
Jocy stated that he believes the Pump.fun team has neither the intention nor the ability to "pump" or "control" the price. They have already amassed a huge fortune through fees, and this ICO is more like a final "value realization" (Exit Liquidity). In the current market environment with severely insufficient buying pressure, such a high valuation simply cannot be sustained. This is completely different from Hyperliquid's valuation support logic. Jocy believes that this market public fundraising is a highly speculative gamble, not a fundamental investment. The funds invested should be risk capital that can be completely lost. The market's enthusiasm for meme launch platforms and shitcoins has shown signs of fatigue. Investors are advised to wait for the token to trade on the open market for a week before making a decision, observing the true market response.
You may also like

$75 billion in risk asset redistribution: How will SpaceX's IPO affect U.S. stocks and Bitcoin?

How TradeXYZ, xStocks, and Alpaca break down the SpaceX IPO into three different strategies

Why Is BlackRock Investing $5 Billion in the SpaceX IPO?

Cryptocurrency market makers collectively seek change as it becomes increasingly difficult to make money

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash flow is the moat

Citibank releases "2030 Asset Tokenization Market Outlook": 6 major trends may create a $8.2 trillion market

The trillion-dollar valuation test: Are the three major super IPOs a celebration for tech stocks or a nightmare for the crypto market?

Morning Report | Digital Asset completes $355 million financing led by a16z Crypto; Meta completes operational separation from Manus

Morning News | CME Group launches Nasdaq Cryptocurrency Index futures; Asset management giant Janus Henderson strategically invests in Ethena

Bitcoin Layer 2 Network Botanix: Why Did We Choose to Dissolve?

Why did Oracle deliver the strongest financial report in history, yet its stock price fell?

When the P2P illicit funds from ten years ago turned into 60,000 bitcoins

Dialogue with OmenX Founder: Why does the prediction market need an evolution from "spot" to "derivatives"?

Galaxy in-depth report: Is Solana still worth paying attention to?

Young people in South Korea make a "final effort" in the epic bull market

The pricing controversy of Trade.xyz exposes the fatal weakness of Pre-IPO perpetual contracts

How much longer can Ethereum's last big buyer hold on?

